Which case established the principle that police can use necessary force to prevent a fleeing felon’s escape?

The case that established the principle allowing police to use necessary force to prevent a fleeing felon's escape is Tennessee v. Garner. This landmark Supreme Court decision addressed the standards for the use of deadly force by law enforcement. The court ruled that the use of deadly force to apprehend a fleeing suspect is unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment, unless the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.

In this case, the Court emphasized the importance of balancing the need for law enforcement to apprehend suspects against the individual’s right to be free from unreasonable seizures. The ruling set a clear legal precedent concerning the use of deadly force, restricting its application to situations where immediate danger is present. This decision is crucial in shaping police conduct and ensuring accountability regarding the use of force during apprehension of suspects, especially when the suspect is fleeing.

The other cases mentioned deal with different legal principles: Miranda v. Arizona deals with the rights of individuals during police interrogations, Graham v. Connor addresses the reasonableness of force used by police, and Roe v. Wade pertains to reproductive rights. Each of these cases has significant implications in their respective areas of law but does not relate directly to the use